(begins in the middle of the interview)

LN laughing: You can't be al things to all people. You can't walk out in the street and everybody's saying "It's fantastic; I love the actors, I love the set, I love the script, I love the photography, everything about it. It's just not realistic to expect that. There's always gonna be something about a Star Trek movie or whatever that somebody is gonna say “Yee, I liked it better when they did such and such."

You try to capture as much as the audience as you can and as far as criticism is concerned, nobody likes to be told somebody didn't like their work. I have a problem with that. I take negative reviews very seriously and the good ones are never good enough.

A lot of critics seem to hold something in reserve; they don't seem to humble completely for this kind of thing. So they say: "Well, this was good, but let's keep in mind that such and such." So, what does it mean? Did they like it or didn't they like it? Why don't they say they like the project?